Mitt Romney – Republican who believes in free will rather than censorship?

Well, I was doing an excellent job of wasting valuable time and came across this blog post on Pandagon:

Mitt Romney Criticized for Hardcore Hotel Porn

Tee hee — that’s the AP headline. The fundies are mad at the Mittster for not doing anything about Marriott Hotels offering in-room porn to its customers when he was on its board. (KUTV):

Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney, who rails against the “cesspool” of pornography, is being criticized by social conservatives who argue that he should have tried to halt hardcore hotel movie offerings during his near-decade on the Marriott board.…”Marriott is a major pornographer. And even though he may have fought it, everyone on that board is a hypocrite for presenting themselves as family values when their hotels offer 70 different types of hardcore pornography,” said Phil Burress, president of Citizens for Community Values, an anti-pornography group based on Ohio.

…Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, a leading conservative group in Washington, said: “They have to assume some responsibility. It’s their hotels, it’s their television sets.”

Burress, you might recall, also owns the web site CleanHotels.com, a listing service to alert travelers where there is no availability to order such pay-for-play content. Pay per view porn generates up to $500 million for the hotel industry, so it’s not going away.

Never mind that a ChristiaNet poll last year found 50% of all Christian men and 20% of all Christian women are addicted to pornography. One assumes some of them are ordering up porn when they are on the road.

Romney brushes aside the criticism, apparently giving porn the thumbs up for adults — he’s just concerned about kids.

Romney said his current concern is not about pornography per se, but children unwittingly stumbling upon it on the Internet or television. “I am not pursuing an effort to try and stop adults from being able to acquire or see things that I find objectionable; that’s their right. But I do vehemently oppose practices or business procedures that will allow kids to be exposed to obscenity,” the former Massachusetts governor said.

Well, I hate to tell him, but that answer isn’t going to appease the bible beaters, who don’t want any eyes on fornication on the idiot box.

I am pleasantly surprised that a Republican presidential candidate took a stand for personal choice like that. I completely agree with the last statement. The religious right will not like this one bit, so he’s going to lose all those points he made by advocating “enhanced terrorism techniques” torture in the political debates. That is the kind of compromise that we need. I support your right to limit what your children watch, but don’t limit my choices as a result.

It’s the whole Grand Theft Auto argument all over again. One strike against Hillary on that in my book. People on the left and right saying it’s violent and overtly sexual blah blah blah. Yeah. It may be, but the ESRB initially rated it M for mature and should not have been sold to anyone under 17. The powers that be lobbied and got it changed to Adults Only… 18 and older. Stupid. Watch and limit what your children are doing when they are playing games. Bah.

Advertisements

1 Response to “Mitt Romney – Republican who believes in free will rather than censorship?”


  1. 1 Shel July 8, 2007 at 10:50 am

    You said it, sistah! Thank you for pointing out more hypocrysy in our government.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




del.icio.us


%d bloggers like this: